Thank you, Kang, for this prompt and authoritative reply. It appears that the first instance of "configtbd" might have been meant to be generalised, as in "configX" for one of these values for X ... The 2nd and the 3rd instances appear to be simple typographical errors. As a follow up question, has anyone asked about "configtbd" before? I must have searched wrong. Hopeful thanks --todd
↧